3-*- Mode:Text; Fonts:Ct18B,25FR3,CPTFONTB,HL6 -*- 
1Postscript:  Submission of Comments

0For Submission of comments  on this Draft  Ada Reference Manual,  we
would appreciate them being sent by Arpanet to the address

     Ada-Comment at HI-MULTICS

If you don not have Arpanet access, please send the comments by mail
 
 - In the United States to 

        Dennis Cornhill
        Honeywell SRC
        2600 Ridgway Parkway
        Minneapolis MN 55413

- In Europe or the rest of the world to

        Jean Ichbiah
        ALSYS
        29 avenue de Versailles
        78170 La Celle Saint Cloud
        France

For mail comments,  it will  assist us  if you  are able  to send them on
8-inch single-sided single-density IBM format diskette - but even if  you
can  manage  this,  please  also  send  us  a  paper  copy,  in  case   of
problems with reading the diskette.

All comments  will  be  sorted  and  processed mechanically in order to
simplify   their   analysis    and   to    facilitate   giving    them   proper
consideration.  To aid this process you are kindly requested to precede
each comment with a three line header

        !section ...
        !version 16
        !topic ...

The section line  includes the  section number,  the paragraph  number
enclosed in parentheses, your name or affiliation (or both), and the date
in ISO standard  form (year-month-day).   The paragraph  number is the
one given  in  the  margin  of  the  paper  form  of  this  draft  (it  is not
contained in the Eclb  files); paragraph numbers  are optional, but  very
helpful.  As an example here is the section line of comment #1194  on
a previous draft:

     !section 03.02.01(12) D.Taffs 82-04-26

The version  line,  for  comments  on  the  draft  standard,  should only
contain "!version  16".   Its  purpose  is  to  distinguish comments that
refer to different versions.

The topic line should contain a one line summary of the comment.  This
line is  essential,  and  you  are  kindly  asked  to avoid topics such as
"typo" or "Editorial  comment" which  will not  convey any information
when printed in a  table of contents.   As an example  of an informative
topic line consider:

     !topic Subcomponents of constants are constants

Note also  that  nothing  prevents  the  topic  line from including all the
information of a comment, as in the following topic line:

     !topic Editorial:  "... are {implicitly} defined by a subtype
     declaration"

As a  final  example  here  is  a  complete comment received on a prior
version of this draft:

     !section 03.02.01(12) D. Taffs 82-04-26
     !version 10
     !topic Subcomponents of constants are constants

     Change "component" to "subcomponent" in the last sentence.

     Otherwise the statement is inconsistent with the defined use
     of subcomponent in 3.3, which says that subcomponents are
     excluded when the term component is used instead of subcomponent.